Overview
Spring AI Bench measures modern agents on real enterprise development tasks — issue triage, PR review, coverage uplift, compliance validation, dependency upgrades. Run benchmarks on YOUR repos to measure YOUR scenarios. If agents have evolved, benchmarks must evolve too.
Existing benchmarks (SWE-bench) measure yesterday’s agents on static 2023 Python patches. They can’t evaluate the agents teams actually use (Claude, Gemini, Amazon Q, Amp) on enterprise Java workflows.
Why Different from SWE-bench
Full Dev Lifecycle
Beyond patch loops: triage, PR review, coverage, compliance
Java-First
Agents show dismal 7-10% lower results on Java - we need better benchmarks
Any Agent
Claude, Gemini, Amazon Q, Amp, custom — not just one architecture
Reproducible
One-click Docker + open scaffolding
Modern Paradigm
2025 declarative goal agents, not 2024 patch-loops
Open Standards
Following best practices for benchmark design
What Spring AI Bench Does
Can AI act as a true Java developer agent? Not just fixing bugs, but:1
Issue Analysis
Analyzing and labeling issues with domain-specific labels
2
PR Review
Comprehensive pull request analysis with risk assessment
3
Test Coverage
Raising coverage while keeping builds green
4
Static Analysis
Cleaning up checkstyle violations and code quality issues
5
API Migration
Migrating APIs and upgrading dependencies
6
Compliance
Keeping builds compliant with enterprise standards
Run It Yourself
Unlike static benchmarks, Spring AI Bench runs on YOUR repos:Current Implementation
Supported Agent Providers
Spring AI Bench integrates with multiple AI agent providers through the Spring AI Agents framework:Claude Code

Gemini

Amazon Q

Amp

Codex

Custom Agents
Bring your own agent implementation
Benchmark Tracks
✅ Production Ready
✅ Production Ready
- hello-world: File creation and basic infrastructure validation
- Code Coverage Uplift: Autonomous test generation achieving 71.4% coverage on Spring tutorials
🚧 In Active Development
🚧 In Active Development
- Issue Analysis & Labeling: Automated issue triage and classification
- Pull Request Review: Comprehensive PR analysis with structured reports
- Static Analysis Remediation: Fix code quality issues while preserving functionality
📋 Future Roadmap
📋 Future Roadmap
- Integration Testing
- Bug Fixing
- Dependency Upgrades
- API Migration
- Compliance Validation
- Performance Optimization
- Documentation Generation
Code Coverage Achievement
One of the most impressive demonstrations of Spring AI Bench is the autonomous code coverage agent that increased test coverage from 0% to 71.4% on Spring’s official gs-rest-service tutorial.Coverage Results
- Starting Coverage: 0%
- Final Coverage: 71.4%
- Tests Generated: Complete test suite
- Build Status: ✅ All tests passing
Code Quality
- Claude: Production-ready tests with @WebMvcTest, jsonPath(), BDD naming
- Gemini: Same coverage, but used slower @SpringBootTest patterns
- Key Insight: Model quality matters beyond just metrics
Learn More: See the full Code Coverage Analysis in the official documentation for detailed results and methodology.
Architecture
Spring AI Bench is built around a Sandbox abstraction:LocalSandbox
Direct process execution (fast, development)
DockerSandbox
Container isolation (secure, production-ready)
CloudSandbox
Distributed execution (planned)
- BenchHarness: End-to-end benchmark execution
- AgentRunner: Agent execution with Spring AI Agents integration
- SuccessVerifier: Validation of benchmark results
- ReportGenerator: HTML and JSON report generation
Resources
Official Documentation
Complete documentation and analysis
GitHub Repository
View source code and contribute
Getting Started
Quick start guide and setup
Code Coverage Results
Detailed coverage analysis and results
Agent Integration
Setting up AI agents for benchmarking
Why Different from SWE-bench
Evidence and comparative analysis